The ongoing crisis in Rivers State has prompted calls for a more rigorous decision-making process within the National Assembly. Concerns have emerged over the potential use of a voice vote to adopt resolutions pertaining to the crisis. Critics argue that such a method might not accurately reflect the sentiment of all members and could undermine the democratic process.
The crux of the issue lies in the ability of the Assembly to secure the constitutionally mandated two-thirds majority needed to ratify significant declarations, such as those made by President Tinubu regarding the crisis. A voice vote, which involves members verbally expressing their approval or disapproval, might not effectively capture the nuanced positions of all legislators.
Given the complexities of the situation in Rivers State, there is a push for the Assembly to adopt more transparent voting methods to ensure that any decision reflects a comprehensive and accurate representation of lawmakers’ positions. This call highlights the broader necessity for transparent and accountable governance in addressing regional conflicts that impact national stability.
Source: Read more